Service Pattern Finder

Shows which citizen responses commonly appear together across each service area.

Environmental Management
Analysis Scope Complete active dataset

Association rules are generated from all eligible records in the active dataset. Region and LGU filters do not apply to these saved patterns.

What this page shows: recurring combinations in citizen survey responses for Environmental Management. A pattern is a clue that two experiences often occur together; it does not prove that one caused the other.
Key recurring pattern

Main finding: Availment is linked with other service experiences

Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action, and reported satisfaction with Environmental Management had an 87.2% likelihood of also using Environmental Management.

Evidence strength Near Baseline Pattern appears in 1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%). Total active respondents: 4,500.

What the Current Pattern May Mean

What the numbers mean This pattern is mainly about citizens moving from knowing the service to actually using it. When the starting responses were present, 87.2% also showed the linked outcome. The complete pattern appeared in 32.5% of eligible survey records.
What to check Readers may check whether citizens who know about Environmental Management can easily access it, including distance, requirements, schedule, and staff assistance.
Suggested next step If awareness does not lead to use, the next practical step is to review possible access barriers.
Important caution: Read this as a guide for review, not as a final judgment or proof of cause and effect. Confirm the pattern using LGU records, field context, and follow-up consultation.

How to Read This View

This view looks for response patterns that often happen together. For example, it can show whether citizens who are aware of a service also tend to use it, feel satisfied with it, or still ask for government action.
  • Seen in Records (Support)
    How many eligible responses show the same pattern.
  • Observed Together (Confidence)
    How often the linked responses appear together when the first response is present.
  • Link Strength (Lift)
    How much stronger the pattern is than ordinary chance. Above 1 means the link is meaningful.

Pattern Summary

Result Area Patterns Seen in Records (Support) Observed Together (Confidence) Link Strength (Lift)
Availment 6 83.1% 1.02
Satisfaction 4 92.6% 1.01
Awareness 2 78.7% 1.01
Patterns Found
12
Observed Together (Confidence)
85.5%
Link Strength (Lift)
1.01
Meaningful Positive Links
0
Response Pattern Explorer

Compare Rules by Link Strength

Interpret a Rule

Choose a rule to connect the chart label with its evidence and practical meaning.

Rule 1 · Availment

Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action, and reported satisfaction with Environmental Management had an 87.2% likelihood of also using Environmental Management.

Support1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%)
Confidence87.2%
Lift1.04
Near baseline: The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.

Unified Rule Evidence and Implications

Support shows how common the complete pattern is. Confidence shows how often the linked outcome appears when the starting responses are present. Lift shows whether the link is stronger than the normal baseline.
Rule Result Area Plain Reading Seen in Records (Support) Observed Together (Confidence) Link Strength (Lift) Lift Assessment Practical Interpretation
Rule 1 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action, and reported satisfaction with Environmental Management had an 87.2% likelihood of also using Environmental Management. 1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%) 87.2% 1.04 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 2 Satisfaction Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and used Environmental Management had a 94.4% likelihood of also reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 2,737 of 4,091 eligible respondents (66.9%) 94.4% 1.03 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 3 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and reported satisfaction with Environmental Management had an 85.4% likelihood of also using Environmental Management. 2,737 of 4,091 eligible respondents (66.9%) 85.4% 1.02 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 4 Awareness Citizens who used Environmental Management had an 80.1% likelihood of also knew about Environmental Management and reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 2,737 of 4,091 eligible respondents (66.9%) 80.1% 1.02 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 5 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management had a 79.3% likelihood of also using Environmental Management and reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 2,737 of 4,091 eligible respondents (66.9%) 79.3% 1.02 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 6 Satisfaction Citizens who used Environmental Management had a 93.2% likelihood of also reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 3,185 of 4,091 eligible respondents (77.9%) 93.2% 1.01 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 7 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action had an 84.6% likelihood of also using Environmental Management. 1,442 of 4,091 eligible respondents (35.2%) 84.6% 1.01 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 8 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management had an 84.0% likelihood of also using Environmental Management. 2,899 of 4,091 eligible respondents (70.9%) 84.0% 1.01 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 9 Satisfaction Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action, and used Environmental Management had a 92.3% likelihood of also reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%) 92.3% 1.00 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 10 Availment Citizens who knew about Environmental Management, and felt a need for further action had a 78.1% likelihood of also using Environmental Management and reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%) 78.1% 1.00 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 11 Awareness Citizens who felt a need for further action, and used Environmental Management had a 77.3% likelihood of also knew about Environmental Management and reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 1,331 of 4,091 eligible respondents (32.5%) 77.3% 0.99 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.
Rule 12 Satisfaction Citizens who felt a need for further action, and used Environmental Management had a 90.5% likelihood of also reporting satisfaction with Environmental Management. 1,557 of 4,091 eligible respondents (38.1%) 90.5% 0.98 Near baseline The pattern may be common, but it occurs at about the expected baseline rate. Use it for monitoring rather than as evidence of a strong relationship.