Support to Education

Cross-stage service delivery review across awareness, availment, satisfaction, and need for action.

4 indicators

Service Area Region LGU

Avg Awareness

81.55%

Avg Availment

39.64%

Avg Satisfaction

95.68%

Avg Need for Action

48.92%

Stage Overview

Service Gaps

This view highlights indicators where citizens may know about a service but do not use it, use it but are not satisfied, or still need government action. For filtered Region/LGU views, results are descriptive evidence for local planning and should be validated with LGU records or field review.

iv · Availment Gap

Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs

64.8% highest concern signal

Citizens may know about the service but are not using it at the same level.

Awareness83.4%
Availment18.6%
Satisfaction95.4%
Need for Action51.8%

Suggested guide: Review access barriers such as requirements, distance, cost, schedule, or application process.

iii · Need for Action

Scholarships and other assistance programs for students

51.3% highest concern signal

Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action.

Awareness77.3%
Availment27.9%
Satisfaction94.6%
Need for Action51.3%

Suggested guide: Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

i · Need for Action

Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics

46.7% highest concern signal

Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action.

Awareness80.6%
Availment61.7%
Satisfaction95.9%
Need for Action46.7%

Suggested guide: Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

ii · Need for Action

Sports programs and activities

45.8% highest concern signal

Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action.

Awareness84.9%
Availment50.3%
Satisfaction96.9%
Need for Action45.8%

Suggested guide: Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

Frequency Count

This view shows compact Yes/No frequency counts and percentages for each service indicator across awareness, availment, satisfaction, and need for action.

Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics

Aware Yes 80.62% · No 19.38%

Availed Yes 61.68% · No 38.32%

Satisfied Yes 95.89% · No 4.11%

Action Needed Yes 46.74% · No 53.26%

View counts

Stage	Yes	Yes %	No	No %
Aware	3507	80.62	843	19.38
Availed	2163	61.68	1344	38.32
Satisfied	2074	95.89	89	4.11
Action Needed	1011	46.74	1152	53.26

Sports programs and activities

Aware Yes 84.86% · No 15.14%

Availed Yes 50.31% · No 49.69%

Satisfied Yes 96.88% · No 3.12%

Action Needed Yes 45.84% · No 54.16%

View counts

Stage	Yes	Yes %	No	No %
Aware	3564	84.86	636	15.14
Availed	1793	50.31	1771	49.69
Satisfied	1737	96.88	56	3.12
Action Needed	822	45.84	971	54.16

iii

Scholarships and other assistance programs for students

Aware Yes 77.31% · No 22.69%

Availed Yes 27.95% · No 72.05%

Satisfied Yes 94.57% · No 5.43%

Action Needed Yes 51.28% · No 48.72%

View counts

Stage	Yes	Yes %	No	No %
Aware	3363	77.31	987	22.69
Availed	940	27.95	2423	72.05
Satisfied	889	94.57	51	5.43
Action Needed	482	51.28	458	48.72

Alternative LearningSystem and/or otherSpecial Education Programs

Aware Yes 83.41% · No 16.59%

Availed Yes 18.62% · No 81.38%

Satisfied Yes 95.39% · No 4.61%

Action Needed Yes 51.83% · No 48.17%

View counts

Stage	Yes	Yes %	No	No %
Aware	3378	83.41	672	16.59
Availed	629	18.62	2749	81.38
Satisfied	600	95.39	29	4.61
Action Needed	326	51.83	303	48.17

Finding 1

Citizen segment evidence

Available

The clustering result identifies citizen segments and shows whether any segment has lower awareness, lower availment, lower satisfaction, or higher need for action.

Finding 2

Classification evidence

16 indicator models

The decision-tree classification uses citizen segment membership and profile variables as predictors. Most current indicator results are grouped as needs more predictors, which guides how strongly the result may be interpreted.

Finding 3

Association-rule evidence

Lift 1.01

The strongest repeated service-stage pattern is: Respondents who were aware of the education, and availed the education had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the education (Lift: 1.01). This pattern was observed together 96.4% of the time for the eligible records.

Integrated research interpretation

For Support to Education, the harmonized evidence identifies this service-stage concern: Availment Gap in Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs (64.8%). The recurring factor to check is MCA Dim1 (MCA profile dimension) appears in 8 model(s) across 4 stage(s). The repeated service-stage pattern is Satisfaction pattern: 96.4% confidence, lift 1.01. Together, these findings show whether the service-stage, citizen-segment, classification, and association-rule evidence point toward the same analytical interpretation.

Evidence agreement: strong consensus. The findings should be checked against local service records and field context before they are used for planning. Proposed actions, responsible offices, and monitoring indicators are presented separately in the Decision Support module.

Supporting Evidence Views

Citizen Segments: View segment profile and statistical support
Classification: View predictor and model readiness evidence
Association Rules: View repeated service-stage patterns

Research Interpretation Guide

The result is not based on one model alone. Clustering contributes the citizen-segment lens, classification contributes predictor-based explanation, and association rules contribute repeated service-stage relationships. This supports the thesis claim that the portal implements a multi-model predictive analytics framework for evidence-based service evaluation.

Analytics → Harmonization → Human Review → Action

Harmonized Evidence Table Supporting Human Decision-Making

Cross-stage, clustering, classification, and association-rule results are integrated as evidence for LGU review. Recommended actions remain subject to local validation and approval.

4 action items

Priorities are generated from the active dataset's largest indicator-level service gaps. Segment labels identify the portal group with the strongest related concern signal.

Every evidence record includes: 1. Rank 2. Cross-Stage Result 3. Citizen Segment Summary 4. Decision Tree Evidence 5. Repeated Service-Stage Pattern 6. Recommended LGU Action 7. Evidence Audit 8. Implementation

Dynamic indicator flow

Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs

Hover over each node for the complete generated result. The four analytical evidence sources are harmonized to support human review of the recommended action, validation requirement, and monitoring measure.

Rank	Cross-Stage Result	Citizen Segment Summary	Decision Tree Evidence	Repeated Service-Stage Pattern	Recommended LGU Action	Evidence Audit	Implementation
1	Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs Availment Gap (64.8%) Citizens may know about the service but are not using it at the same level. Awareness 83.4%; availment 18.6%; satisfaction 95.4%; need for action 51.8%.	Working male homeowners (Segment A) (16.1%) Working male homeowners (Segment A) has the lowest positive response at 16.1% for this indicator. View detailed clustering results in Citizen Segments	Model quality Needs more predictors: F1 30.9%, ROC AUC 51.0%. The model has difficulty separating respondents based on ROC AUC, recall, or F1. Strongest feature Highest Educational Attainment (51.2% importance)	Respondents who were aware of the education, and availed the education had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the education (Lift: 1.01). Support 35.9%, confidence 96.4%, lift 1.01.	Review access barriers such as requirements, distance, cost, schedule, or application process.	Supports: Conflicts: Insufficient: Harmonized evidence statuses	Local School Board / Education Office Monitor: Reduction in awareness-to-availment gap Validate:
2	Scholarships and other assistance programs for students Need for Action (51.3%) Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action. Awareness 77.3%; availment 27.9%; satisfaction 94.6%; need for action 51.3%.	Young single student citizens (Segment B) (57.6%) Young single student citizens (Segment B) has the highest concern signal at 57.6% for this indicator. View detailed clustering results in Citizen Segments	Model quality Limited signal: F1 60.5%, ROC AUC 52.1%. The model can be reviewed as an exploratory clue, but F1, ROC AUC, or baseline gain is not strong enough for confident prediction. Strongest feature MCA Dim1 (49.4% importance)	Respondents who were aware of the education, and availed the education had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the education (Lift: 1.01). Support 35.9%, confidence 96.4%, lift 1.01.	Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.	Supports: Conflicts: Insufficient: Harmonized evidence statuses	Local School Board / Education Office Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage Validate:
3	Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics Need for Action (46.7%) Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action. Awareness 80.6%; availment 61.7%; satisfaction 95.9%; need for action 46.7%.	Young single student citizens (Segment B) (55.8%) Young single student citizens (Segment B) has the highest concern signal at 55.8% for this indicator. View detailed clustering results in Citizen Segments	Model quality Needs more predictors: F1 45.2%, ROC AUC 47.7%. The model has difficulty separating respondents based on ROC AUC, recall, or F1. Strongest feature MCA Dim1 (41.6% importance)	Respondents who were aware of the education, and availed the education had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the education (Lift: 1.01). Support 35.9%, confidence 96.4%, lift 1.01.	Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.	Supports: Conflicts: Insufficient: Harmonized evidence statuses	Local School Board / Education Office Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage Validate:
4	Sports programs and activities Need for Action (45.8%) Citizens who used the service still indicate a need for government action. Awareness 84.9%; availment 50.3%; satisfaction 96.9%; need for action 45.8%.	Young single student citizens (Segment B) (51.8%) Young single student citizens (Segment B) has the highest concern signal at 51.8% for this indicator. View detailed clustering results in Citizen Segments	Model quality Needs more predictors: F1 41.4%, ROC AUC 49.8%. The model has difficulty separating respondents based on ROC AUC, recall, or F1. Strongest feature Grade level: Level (K-12) 2 (68.2% importance)	Respondents who were aware of the education, and availed the education had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the education (Lift: 1.01). Support 35.9%, confidence 96.4%, lift 1.01.	Prioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.	Supports: Conflicts: Insufficient: Harmonized evidence statuses	Local School Board / Education Office Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage Validate:

Priority method: Critical for satisfaction or need-for-action gaps of at least 50%; High for gaps of at least 40%; Medium for gaps of at least 20%; otherwise Low. Recommendations remain decision-support evidence and should be confirmed with service records, budget feasibility, field validation, and stakeholder review.

Showing 4500 of 4500 respondent records for All Mindanao records.