CSIS Action Grid

Official Satisfaction–Need for Action classification for Support to Education. Each indicator uses its eligible response base to calculate the CSIS cutoff.

Opportunities for ImprovementLow Satisfaction · High Need for Action. Give greatest attention.
Continued EmphasisHigh Satisfaction · High Need for Action. Sustain strengths and fine-tune.
Secondary PriorityLow Satisfaction · Low Need for Action. Improve where practical.
Exceeded ExpectationsHigh Satisfaction · Low Need for Action. Sustain performance.

The axes show percentage-point distance from each indicator’s own cutoff. Zero is the CSIS boundary. Values to the right indicate High Satisfaction; values above zero indicate High Need for Action.

RankIndicatorSatisfactionNeed for ActionCSIS classification
1 Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs 95.4%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=629		 51.8%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=629		 Exceeded Expectations
2 Scholarships and other assistance programs for students 94.6%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=940		 51.3%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=940		 Exceeded Expectations
3 Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics 95.9%
Cutoff 52.1% · n=2163		 46.7%
Cutoff 52.1% · n=2163		 Exceeded Expectations
4 Sports programs and activities 96.9%
Cutoff 52.3% · n=1793		 45.8%
Cutoff 52.3% · n=1793		 Exceeded Expectations
Method: High means the percentage is at least 50% plus its 95% margin of error. Satisfaction uses respondents who answered the Satisfaction item; Need for Action uses respondents who answered that item. This page is separate from the prototype’s existing four-band Decision Support priority score.