Integrated Decision Records

Official CSIS Action Grid classifications harmonized with service-stage, clustering, Decision Tree, and association-rule evidence for Support to Education.

Open CSIS Action Grid · Open Decision Support
Integrated Decision Record 1

Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
95.4%Satisfaction · cutoff 53.9%
51.8%Need for Action · cutoff 53.9%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Availment Gap (64.8%)
Segment to validateWorking male homeowners (Segment A) (16.1%)
Proposed responseReview access barriers such as requirements, distance, cost, schedule, or application process.
ImplementationLocal School Board / Education Office · Monitor: Reduction in awareness-to-availment gap

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.0%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Alternative Learning System and/or other Special Education Programs is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 95.4% against a 53.9% cutoff, while Need for Action is 51.8% against a 53.9% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is availment gap (64.8%). Segment review identifies Working male homeowners (Segment A) (16.1%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.0%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 2

Scholarships and other assistance programs for students

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
94.6%Satisfaction · cutoff 53.2%
51.3%Need for Action · cutoff 53.2%
CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (51.3%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (57.6%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationLocal School Board / Education Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 52.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Scholarships and other assistance programs for students is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 94.6% against a 53.2% cutoff, while Need for Action is 51.3% against a 53.2% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (51.3%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (57.6%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 52.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 3

Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
95.9%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.1%
46.7%Need for Action · cutoff 52.1%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (46.7%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (55.8%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationLocal School Board / Education Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 47.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Provision of medical and/or nutritional services to school clinics is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 95.9% against a 52.1% cutoff, while Need for Action is 46.7% against a 52.1% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (46.7%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (55.8%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 47.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 4

Sports programs and activities

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
96.9%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.3%
45.8%Need for Action · cutoff 52.3%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (45.8%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (51.8%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationLocal School Board / Education Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 49.8%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Sports programs and activities is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 96.9% against a 52.3% cutoff, while Need for Action is 45.8% against a 52.3% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (45.8%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (51.8%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 49.8%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.01) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.