Service Pattern Finder

Shows which citizen responses commonly appear together across each service area.

Public Works and Infrastructure
Locality Filter All Mindanao records

Showing 4500 of 4500 respondent records. Predictive model scores remain the full-sample reference unless retraining is explicitly run.

Main message

Strongest pattern points to Availment

Citizens who felt a need for further action, and were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 95% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.02).

Rule 1 · Strength 1.02

Most repeated result area

Availment appears as a common linked outcome

The system found 6 repeated pattern(s) for this result area. On average, the linked responses were observed together 90.8% of the time, with link strength (lift) 1.01.

Use for service monitoring

Decision use

Use this as a planning clue, not a final conclusion

For Public Works and Infrastructure, these patterns can guide which service-stage links need checking through LGU records, field validation, or follow-up interviews.

Supports evidence-based review

Suggested Guide Based on Results

Reader note: The statements below explain what the current result may suggest for Public Works and Infrastructure.

This pattern is mainly about citizens moving from knowing the service to actually using it. In this dataset, the pattern appeared in 34.9% of eligible responses, and the linked result was observed consistently within that group.

Readers may check whether citizens who know about Public Works and Infrastructure can easily access it, including distance, requirements, schedule, and staff assistance.

If awareness does not lead to use, the next practical step is to review possible access barriers.

Please read this as a guide for review, not as a final judgment or proof of cause and effect. The link strength (lift) is 1.02; values above 1 mean the pattern appears more often than ordinary chance.

How to Read This View

This view looks for response patterns that often happen together. For example, it can show whether citizens who are aware of a service also tend to use it, feel satisfied with it, or still ask for government action.
  • Seen in Records (Support)
    How many eligible responses show the same pattern.
  • Observed Together (Confidence)
    How often the linked responses appear together when the first response is present.
  • Link Strength (Lift)
    How much stronger the pattern is than ordinary chance. Above 1 means the link is meaningful.

Pattern Summary

Result Area Patterns Seen in Records (Support) Observed Together (Confidence) Link Strength (Lift)
Availment 6 56.8% 90.8% 1.01
Satisfaction 6 57.0% 84.6% 0.99
NeedAction 1 46.5% 50.0% 1.00
Patterns Found
13
Observed Together (Confidence)
84.8%
Link Strength (Lift)
1.00
Strong Patterns
8

Strongest Response Patterns

Chart Key

The chart uses short labels so it stays readable. Match each label here to understand the full response pattern.
  • Rule 1
    Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 95% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.02).     Lift 1.02
  • Rule 2
    Respondents who were aware of the public_works had a 86% likelihood of also availed the public_works, and were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.02).     Lift 1.02
  • Rule 3
    Respondents who were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 95% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.02).     Lift 1.02
  • Rule 4
    Respondents who availed the public_works had a 80% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works (Lift: 1.02).     Lift 1.02
  • Rule 5
    Respondents who availed the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 91% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.02).     Lift 1.02
  • Rule 6
    Respondents who were aware of the public_works had a 94% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.01).     Lift 1.01
  • Rule 7
    Respondents who availed the public_works had a 90% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.01).     Lift 1.01
  • Rule 8
    Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were aware of the public_works had a 94% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.01).     Lift 1.01

How This Helps Decision-Makers

Use these patterns as clues for planning and validation. They do not prove cause and effect, but they help show which citizen experiences often appear together and may need closer review by the LGU.
This section supports the portal by showing common links in citizen feedback after the profile segments and prediction results have already been reviewed.

Detailed Response Patterns

Rule Result Area Plain Reading Seen in Records (Support) Observed Together (Confidence) Link Strength (Lift) Strength
Rule 1 Availment Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 95% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.02). 34.9% 95.3% 1.02 strong
Rule 2 Availment Respondents who were aware of the public_works had a 86% likelihood of also availed the public_works, and were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.02). 74.5% 85.9% 1.02 strong
Rule 3 Availment Respondents who were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 95% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.02). 74.5% 94.9% 1.02 strong
Rule 4 Satisfaction Respondents who availed the public_works had a 80% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works (Lift: 1.02). 74.5% 80.2% 1.02 strong
Rule 5 Satisfaction Respondents who availed the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 91% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.02). 74.5% 91.3% 1.02 strong
Rule 6 Availment Respondents who were aware of the public_works had a 94% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.01). 81.7% 94.2% 1.01 strong
Rule 7 Satisfaction Respondents who availed the public_works had a 90% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 1.01). 83.9% 90.3% 1.01 strong
Rule 8 Availment Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were aware of the public_works had a 94% likelihood of also availed the public_works (Lift: 1.01). 40.5% 93.9% 1.01 strong
Rule 9 NeedAction Respondents who availed the public_works had a 50% likelihood of also felt a need for further action (Lift: 1.00). 46.5% 50.0% 1.00 weak
Rule 10 Satisfaction Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the public_works, and were aware of the public_works had a 86% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 0.96). 34.9% 86.0% 0.96 weak
Rule 11 Availment Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were aware of the public_works had a 81% likelihood of also availed the public_works, and were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 0.96). 34.9% 80.7% 0.96 weak
Rule 12 Satisfaction Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the public_works had a 75% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works, and were aware of the public_works (Lift: 0.96). 34.9% 75.0% 0.96 weak
Rule 13 Satisfaction Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the public_works had a 85% likelihood of also were satisfied with the public_works (Lift: 0.95). 39.5% 84.9% 0.95 weak