Integrated Decision Records | Public Works and Infrastructure

Integrated Decision Record 1

Information and reading center

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation

93.3%Satisfaction · cutoff 54.8%

48.1%Need for Action · cutoff 54.8%

HighAnalytical signal severity · Awareness Gap (70.7%)

Segment to validateMarried women outside school or reported work (Segment E) (26.1%)

Proposed responseStrengthen information campaigns, barangay-level announcements, and direct citizen orientation.

ImplementationEngineering Office / Planning and Development Office · Monitor: Increase in awareness percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 55.0%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Information and reading center is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 93.3% against a 54.8% cutoff, while Need for Action is 48.1% against a 54.8% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is awareness gap (70.7%). Segment review identifies Married women outside school or reported work (Segment E) (26.1%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 55.0%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 2

Barangay roads

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation

77.0%Satisfaction · cutoff 51.6%

62.0%Need for Action · cutoff 51.6%

CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (62.0%)

Segment to validateMarried locally working men (Segment D) (65.6%)

Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

ImplementationEngineering Office / Planning and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 50.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Barangay roads is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 77.0% against a 51.6% cutoff, while Need for Action is 62.0% against a 51.6% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (62.0%). Segment review identifies Married locally working men (Segment D) (65.6%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 50.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 3

Flood Control Management System

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation

82.4%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.1%

58.2%Need for Action · cutoff 52.1%

CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (58.2%)

Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (62.8%)

Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

ImplementationEngineering Office / Planning and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Flood Control Management System is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 82.4% against a 52.1% cutoff, while Need for Action is 58.2% against a 52.1% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (58.2%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (62.8%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 4

Public markets and satellite markets

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation

84.1%Satisfaction · cutoff 51.9%

56.5%Need for Action · cutoff 51.9%

CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (56.5%)

Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (60.7%)

Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

ImplementationEngineering Office / Planning and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.5%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Public markets and satellite markets is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 84.1% against a 51.9% cutoff, while Need for Action is 56.5% against a 51.9% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (56.5%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (60.7%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 51.5%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 5

Public Cemetery

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation

82.5%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.0%

56.4%Need for Action · cutoff 52.0%

CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (56.4%)

Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (59.9%)

Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.

ImplementationEngineering Office / Planning and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 55.2%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Public Cemetery is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 82.5% against a 52.0% cutoff, while Need for Action is 56.4% against a 52.0% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (56.4%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (59.9%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 55.2%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.02) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.