CSIS Action Grid

Official Satisfaction–Need for Action classification for Economic and Investment Promotion. Each indicator uses its eligible response base to calculate the CSIS cutoff.

Opportunities for ImprovementLow Satisfaction · High Need for Action. Give greatest attention.
Continued EmphasisHigh Satisfaction · High Need for Action. Sustain strengths and fine-tune.
Secondary PriorityLow Satisfaction · Low Need for Action. Improve where practical.
Exceeded ExpectationsHigh Satisfaction · Low Need for Action. Sustain performance.

The axes show percentage-point distance from each indicator’s own cutoff. Zero is the CSIS boundary. Values to the right indicate High Satisfaction; values above zero indicate High Need for Action.

RankIndicatorSatisfactionNeed for ActionCSIS classification
1 Organization,accreditation and training of tourism related concessions. 96.3%
Cutoff 56.7% · n=216		 57.9%
Cutoff 56.7% · n=216		 Continued Emphasis
2 Development and maintenance of touristattractions and facilities 91.4%
Cutoff 53.1% · n=974		 57.4%
Cutoff 53.1% · n=974		 Continued Emphasis
3 Access to irrigation facilities or equipment 88.8%
Cutoff 53.5% · n=791		 55.8%
Cutoff 53.5% · n=791		 Continued Emphasis
4 Distribution of planting/farming/fishing materials and/or equipment 92.0%
Cutoff 53.0% · n=1101		 55.7%
Cutoff 53.0% · n=1101		 Continued Emphasis
5 Promotion of Barangay Micro Business Enterprises 93.3%
Cutoff 55.2% · n=360		 55.6%
Cutoff 55.2% · n=360		 Continued Emphasis
6 Accessible farmharvest buying/trading stations 91.1%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=929		 54.8%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=929		 Continued Emphasis
7 Organization and development of farmers, fishermen and their cooperatives 92.6%
Cutoff 53.0% · n=1096		 53.5%
Cutoff 53.0% · n=1096		 Continued Emphasis
8 Product/Brandmarketing and promotion of local goods and touristattractions 94.4%
Cutoff 54.0% · n=610		 53.8%
Cutoff 54.0% · n=610		 Exceeded Expectations
9 Enforcement of fishery laws in municipal waters 95.8%
Cutoff 53.8% · n=660		 52.4%
Cutoff 53.8% · n=660		 Exceeded Expectations
10 Livelihood Programs 92.1%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=925		 52.1%
Cutoff 53.2% · n=925		 Exceeded Expectations
11 Regulation and supervision of businesses 93.3%
Cutoff 52.9% · n=1129		 51.0%
Cutoff 52.9% · n=1129		 Exceeded Expectations
12 Prevention and control of plant and animal pests and diseases; fish kill sand diseases 96.4%
Cutoff 52.8% · n=1185		 50.5%
Cutoff 52.8% · n=1185		 Exceeded Expectations
13 Post-Harvest facilities such as crop dryers, slaughter houses or fish processing facilities 88.6%
Cutoff 53.1% · n=977		 49.6%
Cutoff 53.1% · n=977		 Exceeded Expectations
14 Access to facilities that promote agricultural production such as fish hatcheries and breeding stations 91.9%
Cutoff 55.3% · n=345		 49.0%
Cutoff 55.3% · n=345		 Exceeded Expectations
15 Investment promotion activities such as trade fairs, fiestas, business events and similar events 96.4%
Cutoff 52.6% · n=1475		 48.9%
Cutoff 52.6% · n=1475		 Exceeded Expectations
16 Water and soilresource utilization and conservation projects 94.8%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=616		 47.6%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=616		 Exceeded Expectations
17 Public Employment Services 94.9%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=642		 46.4%
Cutoff 53.9% · n=642		 Exceeded Expectations
Method: High means the percentage is at least 50% plus its 95% margin of error. Satisfaction uses respondents who answered the Satisfaction item; Need for Action uses respondents who answered that item. This page is separate from the prototype’s existing four-band Decision Support priority score.