Strongest pattern points to Satisfaction
Citizens who availed the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare had a 97% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.09).
Rule 1 · Strength 1.09
Satisfaction appears as a common linked outcome
The system found 6 repeated pattern(s) for this result area. On average, the linked responses were observed together 85.1% of the time, with link strength (lift) 1.02.
Use for service monitoring
Use this as a planning clue, not a final conclusion
For Social Welfare Services, these patterns can guide which service-stage links need checking through LGU records, field validation, or follow-up interviews.
Supports evidence-based review
Suggested Guide Based on Results
Reader note: The statements below explain what the current result may suggest for Social Welfare Services.
This pattern is mainly about the citizen's experience after using the service. In this dataset, the pattern appeared in 27.1% of eligible responses, and the linked result was observed consistently within that group.
Readers may check which parts of Social Welfare Services are connected with satisfaction or dissatisfaction, such as timeliness, staff support, and completeness of service.
If the result points to satisfaction concerns, the next practical step is to review service quality and collect frontline feedback from actual users.
Please read this as a guide for review, not as a final judgment or proof of cause and effect. The link strength (lift) is 1.09; values above 1 mean the pattern appears more often than ordinary chance.
How to Read This View
This view looks for response patterns that often happen together. For example, it can show whether
citizens who are aware of a service also tend to use it, feel satisfied with it, or still ask for
government action.
- Seen in Records (Support)
How many eligible responses show the same pattern. - Observed Together (Confidence)
How often the linked responses appear together when the first response is present. - Link Strength (Lift)
How much stronger the pattern is than ordinary chance. Above 1 means the link is meaningful.
Pattern Summary
| Result Area | Patterns | Seen in Records (Support) | Observed Together (Confidence) | Link Strength (Lift) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | 6 | 21.9% | 85.1% | 1.02 |
Patterns Found
6
Observed Together (Confidence)
85.1%
Link Strength (Lift)
1.02
Strong Patterns
4
Strongest Response Patterns
Chart Key
The chart uses short labels so it stays readable. Match each label here to understand the full response pattern.
-
Rule 1
Respondents who availed the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare had a 97% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.09). -
Rule 2
Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare had a 94% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.06). -
Rule 3
Respondents who availed the social_welfare had a 92% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.04). -
Rule 4
Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare had a 89% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.00). -
Rule 5
Respondents who availed the social_welfare had a 70% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare (Lift: 0.97). -
Rule 6
Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare had a 69% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare (Lift: 0.95).
How This Helps Decision-Makers
Use these patterns as clues for planning and validation. They do not prove cause and effect, but they help show
which citizen experiences often appear together and may need closer review by the LGU.
This section supports the portal by showing common links in citizen feedback after the profile segments and
prediction results have already been reviewed.
Detailed Response Patterns
| Rule | Result Area | Plain Reading | Seen in Records (Support) | Observed Together (Confidence) | Link Strength (Lift) | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rule 1 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare had a 97% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.09). | 27.1% | 96.7% | 1.09 | strong |
| Rule 2 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare had a 94% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.06). | 12.6% | 94.3% | 1.06 | strong |
| Rule 3 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the social_welfare had a 92% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.04). | 35.6% | 91.9% | 1.04 | strong |
| Rule 4 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare had a 89% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare (Lift: 1.00). | 16.3% | 89.0% | 1.00 | strong |
| Rule 5 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the social_welfare had a 70% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare (Lift: 0.97). | 27.1% | 69.9% | 0.97 | weak |
| Rule 6 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the social_welfare had a 69% likelihood of also were satisfied with the social_welfare, and were aware of the social_welfare (Lift: 0.95). | 12.6% | 68.6% | 0.95 | weak |