Integrated Decision Records

Official CSIS Action Grid classifications harmonized with service-stage, clustering, Decision Tree, and association-rule evidence for Social Welfare Services.

Integrated Decision Record 1

Older Persons / Senior Citizens Program

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation
83.7%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.1%
60.7%Need for Action · cutoff 52.1%
CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (60.7%)
Segment to validateRetired or older home-secure citizens (Segment C) (63.9%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationSocial Welfare and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 50.5%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation.

Generated coherent discussion

Older Persons / Senior Citizens Program is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 83.7% against a 52.1% cutoff, while Need for Action is 60.7% against a 52.1% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (60.7%). Segment review identifies Retired or older home-secure citizens (Segment C) (63.9%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 50.5%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 2

Personswith Disabilities (PWD)Welfare Program

Continued Emphasis For LGU validation
90.0%Satisfaction · cutoff 54.6%
56.5%Need for Action · cutoff 54.6%
CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (56.5%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (79.3%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationSocial Welfare and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 43.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation.

Generated coherent discussion

Personswith Disabilities (PWD)Welfare Program is classified as Continued Emphasis under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 90.0% against a 54.6% cutoff, while Need for Action is 56.5% against a 54.6% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction while still calling for further action. Positive delivery should be sustained while specific concerns are validated and refined. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (56.5%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (79.3%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 43.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 3

Programs for Internally Displaced Persons

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
92.9%Satisfaction · cutoff 53.9%
53.3%Need for Action · cutoff 53.9%
CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (53.3%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (63.3%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationSocial Welfare and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 46.4%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation.

Generated coherent discussion

Programs for Internally Displaced Persons is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 92.8% against a 53.9% cutoff, while Need for Action is 53.3% against a 53.9% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (53.3%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (63.3%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 46.4%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 4

Childand Youth Welfare Program

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
97.4%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.1%
49.1%Need for Action · cutoff 52.1%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (49.1%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (52.9%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationSocial Welfare and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 48.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation.

Generated coherent discussion

Childand Youth Welfare Program is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 97.4% against a 52.1% cutoff, while Need for Action is 49.1% against a 52.1% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (49.1%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (52.9%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 48.7%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 5

Women’s Welfare Program

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
93.0%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.4%
46.6%Need for Action · cutoff 52.4%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (46.6%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (51.1%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationSocial Welfare and Development Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 45.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors.

Association evidence: The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation.

Generated coherent discussion

Women’s Welfare Program is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 93.0% against a 52.4% cutoff, while Need for Action is 46.6% against a 52.4% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (46.6%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (51.1%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is limited (ROC AUC 45.1%); predictors are validation cues, not reliable explanations or causal factors. The association is modestly above baseline (lift 1.09) and requires validation. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.