Strongest pattern points to Satisfaction
Citizens who availed the governance had a 81% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance (Lift: 1.04).
Rule 1 · Strength 1.04
Availment appears as a common linked outcome
The system found 6 repeated pattern(s) for this result area. On average, the linked responses were observed together 64.2% of the time, with link strength (lift) 1.02.
Use for service monitoring
Use this as a planning clue, not a final conclusion
For Governance and Response, these patterns can guide which service-stage links need checking through LGU records, field validation, or follow-up interviews.
Supports evidence-based review
Suggested Guide Based on Results
Reader note: The statements below explain what the current result may suggest for Governance and Response.
This pattern is mainly about citizens moving from knowing the service to actually using it. In this dataset, the pattern appeared in 52.3% of eligible responses, and the linked result was observed consistently within that group.
Readers may check whether citizens who know about Governance and Response can easily access it, including distance, requirements, schedule, and staff assistance.
If awareness does not lead to use, the next practical step is to review possible access barriers.
Please read this as a guide for review, not as a final judgment or proof of cause and effect. The link strength (lift) is 1.04; values above 1 mean the pattern appears more often than ordinary chance.
How to Read This View
This view looks for response patterns that often happen together. For example, it can show whether
citizens who are aware of a service also tend to use it, feel satisfied with it, or still ask for
government action.
- Seen in Records (Support)
How many eligible responses show the same pattern. - Observed Together (Confidence)
How often the linked responses appear together when the first response is present. - Link Strength (Lift)
How much stronger the pattern is than ordinary chance. Above 1 means the link is meaningful.
Pattern Summary
| Result Area | Patterns | Seen in Records (Support) | Observed Together (Confidence) | Link Strength (Lift) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Availment | 6 | 37.8% | 64.2% | 1.02 |
| Satisfaction | 6 | 39.1% | 89.1% | 1.01 |
Patterns Found
12
Observed Together (Confidence)
76.7%
Link Strength (Lift)
1.01
Strong Patterns
9
Strongest Response Patterns
Chart Key
The chart uses short labels so it stays readable. Match each label here to understand the full response pattern.
-
Rule 1
Respondents who availed the governance had a 81% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance (Lift: 1.04). -
Rule 2
Respondents who were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 67% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.04). -
Rule 3
Respondents who were aware of the governance had a 63% likelihood of also availed the governance, and were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.03). -
Rule 4
Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 66% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.03). -
Rule 5
Respondents who availed the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.03). -
Rule 6
Respondents who were aware of the governance had a 66% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.02). -
Rule 7
Respondents who availed the governance had a 95% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.01). -
Rule 8
Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the governance had a 79% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance (Lift: 1.00).
How This Helps Decision-Makers
Use these patterns as clues for planning and validation. They do not prove cause and effect, but they help show
which citizen experiences often appear together and may need closer review by the LGU.
This section supports the portal by showing common links in citizen feedback after the profile segments and
prediction results have already been reviewed.
Detailed Response Patterns
| Rule | Result Area | Plain Reading | Seen in Records (Support) | Observed Together (Confidence) | Link Strength (Lift) | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rule 1 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the governance had a 81% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance (Lift: 1.04). | 52.3% | 81.5% | 1.04 | strong |
| Rule 2 | Availment | Respondents who were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 67% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.04). | 52.3% | 66.6% | 1.04 | strong |
| Rule 3 | Availment | Respondents who were aware of the governance had a 63% likelihood of also availed the governance, and were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.03). | 52.3% | 62.9% | 1.03 | strong |
| Rule 4 | Availment | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 66% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.03). | 22.0% | 66.0% | 1.03 | strong |
| Rule 5 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 96% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.03). | 52.3% | 95.9% | 1.03 | strong |
| Rule 6 | Availment | Respondents who were aware of the governance had a 66% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.02). | 54.6% | 65.6% | 1.02 | strong |
| Rule 7 | Satisfaction | Respondents who availed the governance had a 95% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 1.01). | 60.8% | 94.7% | 1.01 | strong |
| Rule 8 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the governance had a 79% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance, and were aware of the governance (Lift: 1.00). | 22.0% | 78.9% | 1.00 | strong |
| Rule 9 | Availment | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were aware of the governance had a 64% likelihood of also availed the governance (Lift: 1.00). | 23.7% | 64.4% | 1.00 | strong |
| Rule 10 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the governance, and were aware of the governance had a 93% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 0.99). | 22.0% | 92.9% | 0.99 | weak |
| Rule 11 | Availment | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and were aware of the governance had a 60% likelihood of also availed the governance, and were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 0.98). | 22.0% | 59.8% | 0.98 | weak |
| Rule 12 | Satisfaction | Respondents who felt a need for further action, and availed the governance had a 91% likelihood of also were satisfied with the governance (Lift: 0.97). | 25.3% | 91.0% | 0.97 | weak |