Integrated Decision Records

Official CSIS Action Grid classifications harmonized with service-stage, clustering, Decision Tree, and association-rule evidence for Governance and Response.

Integrated Decision Record 1

Traffic Management

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
89.2%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.2%
51.5%Need for Action · cutoff 52.2%
CriticalAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (51.5%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (59.8%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationOffice of the Local Chief Executive / DILG Focal Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 70.4%), subject to local validation.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Traffic Management is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 89.2% against a 52.2% cutoff, while Need for Action is 51.5% against a 52.2% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (51.5%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (59.8%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 70.4%), subject to local validation. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 2

Disaster Risk Reduction and Management

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
95.7%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.2%
48.1%Need for Action · cutoff 52.2%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (48.1%)
Segment to validateYoung single student citizens (Segment B) (54.3%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationOffice of the Local Chief Executive / DILG Focal Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 71.3%), subject to local validation.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Disaster Risk Reduction and Management is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 95.7% against a 52.2% cutoff, while Need for Action is 48.1% against a 52.2% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (48.1%). Segment review identifies Young single student citizens (Segment B) (54.3%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 71.3%), subject to local validation. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 3

Local government’s response or action oncomplaints against an office,official orpersonnel of the LGU

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
91.8%Satisfaction · cutoff 53.0%
47.7%Need for Action · cutoff 53.0%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (47.7%)
Segment to validateMarried women outside school or reported work (Segment E) (49.1%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationOffice of the Local Chief Executive / DILG Focal Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 73.4%), subject to local validation.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Local government’s response or action oncomplaints against an office,official orpersonnel of the LGU is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 91.8% against a 53.0% cutoff, while Need for Action is 47.7% against a 53.0% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (47.7%). Segment review identifies Married women outside school or reported work (Segment E) (49.1%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 73.4%), subject to local validation. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 4

Public Information Services

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
94.8%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.0%
46.2%Need for Action · cutoff 52.0%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (46.2%)
Segment to validateMarried locally working men (Segment D) (48.4%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationOffice of the Local Chief Executive / DILG Focal Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 70.6%), subject to local validation.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Public Information Services is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 94.8% against a 52.0% cutoff, while Need for Action is 46.2% against a 52.0% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (46.2%). Segment review identifies Married locally working men (Segment D) (48.4%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 70.6%), subject to local validation. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.

Integrated Decision Record 5

Mobile LGUservices/Provision ofmunicipal services to the barangays

Exceeded Expectations For LGU validation
95.1%Satisfaction · cutoff 52.3%
46.0%Need for Action · cutoff 52.3%
HighAnalytical signal severity · Need for Action (46.0%)
Segment to validateMarried locally working men (Segment D) (49.9%)
Proposed responsePrioritize follow-up validation with the service office and compare findings with LGU service records.
ImplementationOffice of the Local Chief Executive / DILG Focal Office · Monitor: Reduction in need-for-action percentage

Model evidence: Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 72.0%), subject to local validation.

Association evidence: The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue.

Generated coherent discussion

Mobile LGUservices/Provision ofmunicipal services to the barangays is classified as Exceeded Expectations under the CSIS Action Grid. Satisfaction is 95.1% against a 52.3% cutoff, while Need for Action is 46.0% against a 52.3% cutoff. Citizens report favorable satisfaction without a high demand for further action. Current performance should be sustained and monitored. The strongest service-stage concern is need for action (46.0%). Segment review identifies Married locally working men (Segment D) (49.9%) for initial validation. Model discrimination is comparatively usable (ROC AUC 72.0%), subject to local validation. The association is near its ordinary baseline (lift 1.04) and is a weak corroborating cue. The proposed response should therefore be treated as a human-review prompt and checked against service records, field conditions, feasibility, and responsible-office feedback.